Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
256,491
in 2024
Uzbekistan
68,169
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
2nd
Uzbekistan rank
18th

Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Uzbekistan
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199520092024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 256,491 against 68,169 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 188,322.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.8 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 10 regions.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 158,428 60,768 97,660 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2000s 185,774 62,684 123,090 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 239,898 66,697 173,201 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 255,240 68,169 187,071 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Uzbekistan?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 256,491 against 68,169 in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Uzbekistan?
188,322, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Uzbekistan?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Uzbekistan rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 10 regions.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/uzbekistan/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed