Malta vs Suriname: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ
Malta
127
in 2024
Suriname
83
in 2024
Malta rank
110th
Suriname rank
112th
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time
- Malta
- Suriname
How they compare
Malta currently reports 127 against 83 in Suriname, a difference of 44.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.5 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.
Malta ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 112th of 114 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Malta |
| 2010s | 75.86 | 82.43 | 6.57 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 129.2 | 83 | 46.2 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Malta or Suriname?
- Malta, at 127 against 83 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Malta and Suriname?
- 44, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
- Malta ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 112th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.