Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Romania: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
5,182
in 2024
Romania
38,666
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
35th
Romania rank
32nd

Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Romania
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199520092024

How they compare

Romania currently reports 38,666 against 5,182 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 33,484.

That makes Romania's figure about 7.5 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 35th and Romania ranks 32nd of 35 groups.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 1,073 32,949 31,876 Romania
2000s 1,805 41,904 40,100 Romania
2010s 3,560 43,708 40,148 Romania
2020s 4,952 39,656 34,704 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Romania?
Romania, at 38,666 against 5,182 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Romania?
33,484, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Romania?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Romania rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 35th and Romania ranks 32nd of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Romania: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/romania/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Romania: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
161 places, 2,414 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed