Australia vs Peru: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%)
Australia
14.1%
in 2024
Peru
13.6%
in 2024
Australia rank
119th
Peru rank
122nd
Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%) over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Australia currently reports 14.1% against 13.6% in Peru, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Australia ranks 119th and Peru ranks 122nd of 155 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.3% | 10.9% | 0.3% | Australia |
| 2020s | 14.0% | 12.1% | 1.9% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, Australia or Peru?
- Australia, at 14.1% against 13.6% in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets between Australia and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Australia ranks 119th and Peru ranks 122nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.