Australia vs South Africa: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Australia
14.1%
in 2024
South Africa
14.4%
in 2024
Australia rank
119th
South Africa rank
117th
Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Australia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 14.4% against 14.1% in Australia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Africa ahead.
Australia ranks 119th and South Africa ranks 117th of 155 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.9% | 11.6% | 2.7% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 14.2% | 3.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 14.0% | 15.1% | 1.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, Australia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 14.4% against 14.1% in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets between Australia and South Africa?
- 0.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Australia and South Africa rank globally for regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Australia ranks 119th and South Africa ranks 117th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.