China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Papua New Guinea: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
13.1%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
29.6%
in 2023
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
3rd
Papua New Guinea rank
5th

Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Papua New Guinea
1015202530200820162024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 29.6% against 13.1% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 16.5%.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.3 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 3rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 3 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2010s 11.2% 25.7% 14.5% Papua New Guinea
2020s 10.9% 29.0% 18.1% Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 29.6% against 13.1% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2023.
What is the difference in regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Papua New Guinea?
16.5%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Papua New Guinea?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Papua New Guinea rank globally for regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 3rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Papua New Guinea: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-tier-1-capital-to-risk-weighted-assets-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-tier-1-capital-to-risk-weighted-assets-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/papua-new-guinea/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Papua New Guinea: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
158 places, 2,450 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed