China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Solomon Islands: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
13.1%
in 2024
Solomon Islands
37.4%
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
3rd
Solomon Islands rank
3rd

Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Solomon Islands
10203040201020172024

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 37.4% against 13.1% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 24.3%.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 2.9 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 3rd and Solomon Islands ranks 3rd of 3 groups.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 11.2% 27.4% 16.1% Solomon Islands
2020s 11.3% 32.6% 21.2% Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 37.4% against 13.1% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Solomon Islands?
24.3%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Solomon Islands?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Solomon Islands rank globally for regulatory tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 3rd and Solomon Islands ranks 3rd of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Solomon Islands: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-tier-1-capital-to-risk-weighted-assets-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-tier-1-capital-to-risk-weighted-assets-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/solomon-islands/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Solomon Islands: Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
158 places, 2,450 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed