Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: River flow maximum
Australia and New Zealand
680,346
in 2024
Central Asia
876,222
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
22nd
Central Asia rank
22nd
River flow maximum over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Central Asia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 876,222 against 680,346 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 195,876.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 22nd and Central Asia ranks 22nd of 203 countries.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 473,111 | 1.01 million | 535,367 | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 630,280 | 968,766 | 338,485 | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 587,938 | 970,425 | 382,487 | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher river flow maximum, Australia and New Zealand or Central Asia?
- Central Asia, at 876,222 against 680,346 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in river flow maximum between Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
- 195,876, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia rank globally for river flow maximum?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 22nd and Central Asia ranks 22nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow maximum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.