China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Papua New Guinea: River flow maximum (m3/s)

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
112.1 m3 per sec
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
477,144 m3 per sec
in 2024
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
35th
Papua New Guinea rank
33rd

River flow maximum (m3/s) over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Papua New Guinea
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200520142024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 477,144 m3 per sec against 112.1 m3 per sec in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 477,032 m3 per sec.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 4,256.3 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 35th and Papua New Guinea ranks 33rd of 36 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 93.61 m3 per sec 402,320 m3 per sec 402,227 m3 per sec Papua New Guinea
2010s 86.42 m3 per sec 468,837 m3 per sec 468,750 m3 per sec Papua New Guinea
2020s 96.19 m3 per sec 490,307 m3 per sec 490,211 m3 per sec Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher river flow maximum, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 477,144 m3 per sec against 112.1 m3 per sec in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in river flow maximum between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Papua New Guinea?
477,032 m3 per sec, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Papua New Guinea?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Papua New Guinea rank globally for river flow maximum?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 35th and Papua New Guinea ranks 33rd of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow maximum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Papua New Guinea: River flow maximum. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/papua-new-guinea/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Papua New Guinea: River flow maximum</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
River flow maximum (m3/s)
Unit
m3 per sec
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
270 places, 5,400 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed