China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs South Sudan: River flow maximum

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
112.1
in 2024
South Sudan
362,990
in 2024
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
32nd
South Sudan rank
31st

River flow maximum over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • South Sudan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200520142024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 362,990 against 112.1 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 362,878.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 3,238.0 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 31st of 33 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 93.61 271,266 271,172 South Sudan
2010s 86.42 305,898 305,812 South Sudan
2020s 96.19 355,806 355,710 South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher river flow maximum, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 362,990 against 112.1 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in river flow maximum between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and South Sudan?
362,878, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and South Sudan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and South Sudan rank globally for river flow maximum?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 31st of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow maximum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs South Sudan: River flow maximum. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/south-sudan/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs South Sudan: River flow maximum</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
River flow maximum (m3/s)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
256 places, 5,120 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed