China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs United Republic of Tanzania: River flow maximum

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
112.1
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
341,961
in 2024
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
36th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
43rd

River flow maximum over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k200520142024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 341,961 against 112.1 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 341,849.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3,050.4 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 36th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 43rd of 37 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 93.61 220,604 220,510 United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 86.42 237,032 236,946 United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 96.19 315,326 315,230 United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher river flow maximum, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 341,961 against 112.1 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in river flow maximum between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and United Republic of Tanzania?
341,849, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and United Republic of Tanzania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for river flow maximum?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 36th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 43rd of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow maximum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs United Republic of Tanzania: River flow maximum. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/united-republic-of-tanzania/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs United Republic of Tanzania: River flow maximum</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
River flow maximum (m3/s)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
269 places, 5,380 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed