China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Zimbabwe: River flow maximum

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
112.1
in 2024
Zimbabwe
371,372
in 2024
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
30th

River flow maximum over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200520142024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 371,372 against 112.1 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 371,260.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3,312.8 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 33 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 93.61 197,849 197,755 Zimbabwe
2010s 86.42 306,381 306,295 Zimbabwe
2020s 96.19 326,432 326,336 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher river flow maximum, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 371,372 against 112.1 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in river flow maximum between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Zimbabwe?
371,260, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Zimbabwe rank globally for river flow maximum?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow maximum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Zimbabwe: River flow maximum. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-maximum-m3-s/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/zimbabwe/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Zimbabwe: River flow maximum</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
River flow maximum (m3/s)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
256 places, 5,120 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed