South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: River flow maximum
South Sudan
362,990 m3 per sec
in 2024
Zimbabwe
371,372 m3 per sec
in 2024
South Sudan rank
37th
Zimbabwe rank
36th
River flow maximum over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 371,372 m3 per sec against 362,990 m3 per sec in South Sudan, a difference of 8,382 m3 per sec.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 271,266 m3 per sec | 197,849 m3 per sec | 73,417 m3 per sec | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 305,898 m3 per sec | 306,381 m3 per sec | 482.9 m3 per sec | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 355,806 m3 per sec | 326,432 m3 per sec | 29,374 m3 per sec | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher river flow maximum, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 371,372 m3 per sec against 362,990 m3 per sec in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in river flow maximum between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 8,382 m3 per sec, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for river flow maximum?
- South Sudan ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow maximum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.