Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: River flow minimum
Australia and New Zealand
91,673
in 2024
Central Asia
110,151
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
21st
Central Asia rank
23rd
River flow minimum over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Central Asia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 110,151 against 91,673 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 18,478.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central Asia ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Central Asia ranks 23rd of 203 countries.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70,632 | 131,083 | 60,451 | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 92,006 | 118,778 | 26,772 | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 72,907 | 119,397 | 46,490 | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher river flow minimum, Australia and New Zealand or Central Asia?
- Central Asia, at 110,151 against 91,673 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in river flow minimum between Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
- 18,478, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia rank globally for river flow minimum?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Central Asia ranks 23rd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow minimum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.