Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: River flow minimum
Australia and New Zealand
91,673
in 2024
Southern Asia
405,276
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
21st
Southern Asia rank
19th
River flow minimum over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Southern Asia currently reports 405,276 against 91,673 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 313,603.
That makes Southern Asia's figure about 4.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Southern Asia ranks 19th of 203 countries.
Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70,632 | 394,762 | 324,130 | Southern Asia |
| 2010s | 92,006 | 402,258 | 310,251 | Southern Asia |
| 2020s | 72,907 | 401,074 | 328,166 | Southern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher river flow minimum, Australia and New Zealand or Southern Asia?
- Southern Asia, at 405,276 against 91,673 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in river flow minimum between Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
- 313,603, with Southern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia rank globally for river flow minimum?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Southern Asia ranks 19th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow minimum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.