Australia and New Zealand vs Western Africa: River flow minimum
Australia and New Zealand
91,673
in 2024
Western Africa
196,476
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
21st
Western Africa rank
21st
River flow minimum over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Western Africa
How they compare
Western Africa currently reports 196,476 against 91,673 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 104,803.
That makes Western Africa's figure about 2.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Western Africa has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Western Africa ranks 21st of 203 countries.
Western Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Western Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70,632 | 140,162 | 69,530 | Western Africa |
| 2010s | 92,006 | 148,796 | 56,790 | Western Africa |
| 2020s | 72,907 | 171,113 | 98,206 | Western Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher river flow minimum, Australia and New Zealand or Western Africa?
- Western Africa, at 196,476 against 91,673 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in river flow minimum between Australia and New Zealand and Western Africa?
- 104,803, with Western Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Western Africa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Western Africa rank globally for river flow minimum?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Western Africa ranks 21st of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow minimum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.