Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: River flow minimum
Ecuador
30,143 m3 per sec
in 2024
Zimbabwe
25,810 m3 per sec
in 2024
Ecuador rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
47th
River flow minimum over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 30,143 m3 per sec against 25,810 m3 per sec in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4,333 m3 per sec.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 217 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29,426 m3 per sec | 14,057 m3 per sec | 15,370 m3 per sec | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 29,627 m3 per sec | 23,520 m3 per sec | 6,107 m3 per sec | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 30,871 m3 per sec | 23,567 m3 per sec | 7,305 m3 per sec | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher river flow minimum, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Ecuador, at 30,143 m3 per sec against 25,810 m3 per sec in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in river flow minimum between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 4,333 m3 per sec, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for river flow minimum?
- Ecuador ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow minimum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.