Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Sudan: River flow minimum

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
1.12 million m3 per sec
in 2024
South Sudan
179,637 m3 per sec
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
17th
South Sudan rank
19th

River flow minimum over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • South Sudan
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M200520142024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.12 million m3 per sec against 179,637 m3 per sec in South Sudan, a difference of 941,023 m3 per sec.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 6.2 times South Sudan's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and South Sudan ranks 19th of 39 groups.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 1.10 million m3 per sec 153,539 m3 per sec 943,777 m3 per sec Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1.19 million m3 per sec 165,107 m3 per sec 1.02 million m3 per sec Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1.13 million m3 per sec 167,752 m3 per sec 963,060 m3 per sec Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher river flow minimum, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or South Sudan?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 1.12 million m3 per sec against 179,637 m3 per sec in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in river flow minimum between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Sudan?
941,023 m3 per sec, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Sudan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Sudan rank globally for river flow minimum?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and South Sudan ranks 19th of 39 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow minimum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Sudan: River flow minimum. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-minimum-m3-s/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/river-flow-minimum-m3-s/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-sudan/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Sudan: River flow minimum</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
River flow minimum (m3/s)
Unit
m3 per sec
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
256 places, 5,120 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed