Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: River flow minimum
Rwanda
1,043 m3 per sec
in 2024
Sri Lanka
821.67 m3 per sec
in 2024
Rwanda rank
123rd
Sri Lanka rank
126th
River flow minimum over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1,043 m3 per sec against 821.67 m3 per sec in Sri Lanka, a difference of 221.33 m3 per sec.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Rwanda ranks 123rd and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 742.21 m3 per sec | 746.44 m3 per sec | 4.23 m3 per sec | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 736.14 m3 per sec | 942.8 m3 per sec | 206.65 m3 per sec | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 906.57 m3 per sec | 790.54 m3 per sec | 116.04 m3 per sec | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher river flow minimum, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Rwanda, at 1,043 m3 per sec against 821.67 m3 per sec in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in river flow minimum between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 221.33 m3 per sec, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for river flow minimum?
- Rwanda ranks 123rd and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as River flow minimum (m3/s). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.