Rwanda vs Uganda: Status under enhanced HIPC initiative
Status under enhanced HIPC initiative over time
- Rwanda
- Uganda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2 against 2 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 7th of 42 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5 | 2 | 0.5 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher status under enhanced hipc initiative, Rwanda or Uganda?
- Rwanda, at 2 against 2 in Uganda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in status under enhanced hipc initiative between Rwanda and Uganda?
- 0, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Rwanda and Uganda rank globally for status under enhanced hipc initiative?
- Rwanda ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 7th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Economic Policy and Debt Department, published as Status under enhanced HIPC initiative. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicator shows the status of heavily indebted poor countries country under the enhanced HIPC initiative. Heavily indebted poor countries reach HIPC decision point if they have a track record of macroeconomic stability, have prepared an Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy through a participatory process, and have cleared or reached an agreement on a process to clear, the outstanding arrears to multilateral creditors. The amount of debt relief necessary to bring countries’ debt indicators to HIPC thresholds is calculated, and countries begin receiving debt relief. Heavily indebted poor countries reach HIPC completion point if they maintain macroeconomic stability under a Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) supported program, carry out key structural and social reforms agreed on at the decision point, and implement satisfactorily Poverty Reduction Strategy for one year. Debt relief is then provided irrevocably by the country’s creditors.