Chile vs New Zealand: Worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of
Chile
0.5%
in 2024
New Zealand
0.4%
in 2024
Chile rank
150th
New Zealand rank
151st
Worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.5% against 0.4% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 150th and New Zealand ranks 151st of 161 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.4% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.4% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of, Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 0.5% against 0.4% in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of?
- Chile ranks 150th and New Zealand ranks 151st of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of product (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.