Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of
Malaysia
3.6%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
3.7%
in 2024
Malaysia rank
96th
Zimbabwe rank
95th
Worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 3.7% against 3.6% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 138 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.8% | 12.0% | 3.8% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 7.5% | 5.5% | 2.0% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 3.7% | 3.8% | 0.2% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 3.7% against 3.6% in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of?
- Malaysia ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Worldwide weighted tariff-average, preferential status, by type of product (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.