Angola vs Iceland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Angola
2.3%
in 2022
Iceland
2.3%
in 2022
Angola rank
25th
Iceland rank
24th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Angola
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.3% against 2.3% in Angola, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 25th and Iceland ranks 24th of 188 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.7% | 1.8% | 2.9% | Angola |
| 2020s | 3.2% | 1.7% | 1.5% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Angola or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 2.3% against 2.3% in Angola as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Angola and Iceland?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Angola and Iceland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Angola ranks 25th and Iceland ranks 24th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.