Argentina vs Congo: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Argentina
3.0%
in 2022
Congo
3.2%
in 2022
Argentina rank
16th
Congo rank
15th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Argentina
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.2% against 3.0% in Argentina, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 16th and Congo ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.9% | 4.6% | 0.8% | Congo |
| 2020s | 3.7% | 2.3% | 1.4% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Argentina or Congo?
- Congo, at 3.2% against 3.0% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Argentina and Congo?
- 0.2%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Congo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Congo rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Argentina ranks 16th and Congo ranks 15th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.