Argentina vs Côte d'Ivoire: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Argentina
3.0%
in 2022
Côte d'Ivoire
3.4%
in 2022
Argentina rank
15th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
1st
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Argentina
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 3.4% against 3.0% in Argentina, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 15th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 174 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.9% | 2.4% | 1.5% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 3.7% | 3.0% | 0.7% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Argentina or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 3.4% against 3.0% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Argentina and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0.4%, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Argentina ranks 15th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.