Argentina vs Wallis and Futuna Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Argentina
3.0%
in 2022
Wallis and Futuna Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Argentina rank
15th
Wallis and Futuna Islands rank
18th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Argentina
- Wallis and Futuna Islands
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 3.0% against 0.0% in Wallis and Futuna Islands, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 213.5 times Wallis and Futuna Islands's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 15th and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Wallis and Futuna Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.9% | 0.0% | 3.9% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 3.7% | 0.1% | 3.6% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Argentina or Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- Argentina, at 3.0% against 0.0% in Wallis and Futuna Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Argentina and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- 3.0%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Wallis and Futuna Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Argentina ranks 15th and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.