Aruba vs Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Aruba
1.2%
in 2022
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
1.2%
in 2022
Aruba rank
51st
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
52nd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Aruba
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 1.2% against 1.2% in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 51st and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 52nd of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.2% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 2.2% | 0.4% | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Aruba or Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
- Aruba, at 1.2% against 1.2% in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Aruba and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
- 0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Aruba ranks 51st and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 52nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.