Aruba vs Eritrea: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Aruba
1.2%
in 2022
Eritrea
1.3%
in 2022
Aruba rank
56th
Eritrea rank
55th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Aruba
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.3% against 1.2% in Aruba, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Eritrea ahead.
Aruba ranks 56th and Eritrea ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8% | 1.6% | 0.7% | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.2% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Aruba or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 1.3% against 1.2% in Aruba as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Aruba and Eritrea?
- 0.1%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eritrea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Eritrea rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Aruba ranks 56th and Eritrea ranks 55th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.