Aruba vs Guinea-Bissau: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Aruba
1.2%
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau
1.2%
in 2022
Aruba rank
56th
Guinea-Bissau rank
59th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Aruba
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 1.2% against 1.2% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Aruba ranks 56th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 59th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8% | 2.5% | 1.7% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 0.8% | 1.0% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Aruba or Guinea-Bissau?
- Aruba, at 1.2% against 1.2% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Aruba and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Guinea-Bissau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Aruba ranks 56th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 59th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.