Asia vs Congo: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Asia
1.0%
in 2022
Congo
3.2%
in 2022
Asia rank
19th
Congo rank
16th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Asia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.2% against 1.0% in Asia, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Congo's figure about 3.1 times Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 19th and Congo ranks 16th of 31 groups.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.0% | 4.6% | 3.6% | Congo |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 2.3% | 1.4% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Asia or Congo?
- Congo, at 3.2% against 1.0% in Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Asia and Congo?
- 2.2%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Congo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Asia and Congo rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Asia ranks 19th and Congo ranks 16th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.