Asia vs Faroe Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Asia
1.0%
in 2022
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Asia rank
18th
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Asia
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 2.4% against 1.0% in Asia, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 2.4 times Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 18th and Faroe Islands ranks 21st of 43 regions.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.0% | 2.0% | 1.0% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 2.5% | 1.6% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Asia or Faroe Islands?
- Faroe Islands, at 2.4% against 1.0% in Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Asia and Faroe Islands?
- 1.4%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Faroe Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Asia and Faroe Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Asia ranks 18th and Faroe Islands ranks 21st of 43 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.