Australia and New Zealand vs Cambodia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Australia and New Zealand
0.4%
in 2022
Cambodia
0.4%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
105th
Cambodia rank
107th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Cambodia
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Cambodia ranks 107th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Cambodia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Australia and New Zealand or Cambodia?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Cambodia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Australia and New Zealand and Cambodia?
- 0.0%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Cambodia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Cambodia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Cambodia ranks 107th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.