Australia and New Zealand vs Romania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Australia and New Zealand
0.4%
in 2022
Romania
0.4%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
105th
Romania rank
102nd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Romania ranks 102nd of 174 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.6% | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.2% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Australia and New Zealand or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Australia and New Zealand and Romania?
- 0.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Romania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Romania ranks 102nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.