Australia and New Zealand vs Sierra Leone: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Australia and New Zealand
0.4%
in 2022
Sierra Leone
0.4%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
105th
Sierra Leone rank
103rd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Sierra Leone ranks 103rd of 174 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.1% | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.2% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Australia and New Zealand or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Australia and New Zealand and Sierra Leone?
- 0.0%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Sierra Leone rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Sierra Leone ranks 103rd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.