Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Australia
0.4%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand
0.4%
in 2022
Australia rank
106th
Australia and New Zealand rank
105th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Australia
- Australia and New Zealand
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Australia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 106th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th of 174 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Australia and New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Australia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Australia ranks 106th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.