Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Australia
0.4%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
0.4%
in 2022
Australia rank
124th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
127th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Australia
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 124th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 127th of 202 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Australia, at 0.4% against 0.4% in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Australia ranks 124th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 127th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.