Barbados vs Côte d'Ivoire: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Barbados
3.7%
in 2022
Côte d'Ivoire
3.4%
in 2022
Barbados rank
10th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
1st
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Barbados
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 3.7% against 3.4% in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 10th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 174 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.3% | 2.4% | 2.9% | Barbados |
| 2020s | 3.0% | 3.0% | 0.0% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Barbados or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Barbados, at 3.7% against 3.4% in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Barbados and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0.3%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Barbados ranks 10th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.