Barbados vs Greenland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Barbados
3.7%
in 2022
Greenland
3.8%
in 2022
Barbados rank
10th
Greenland rank
9th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Barbados
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 3.8% against 3.7% in Barbados, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Greenland ahead.
Barbados ranks 10th and Greenland ranks 9th of 188 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.3% | 3.5% | 1.8% | Barbados |
| 2020s | 3.0% | 3.0% | 0.0% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Barbados or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 3.8% against 3.7% in Barbados as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Barbados and Greenland?
- 0.1%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Greenland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Greenland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Barbados ranks 10th and Greenland ranks 9th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.