Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Dominica: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
1.2%
in 2022
Dominica
1.1%
in 2022
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
52nd
Dominica rank
55th

Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time

  • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Dominica
0246201820202022

How they compare

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 1.2% against 1.1% in Dominica, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Dominica ahead.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 52nd and Dominica ranks 55th of 174 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 1 and Dominica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Dominica Difference Ahead
2010s 0.7% 0.9% 0.2% Dominica
2020s 2.2% 0.6% 1.5% Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba or Dominica?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 1.2% against 1.1% in Dominica as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Dominica?
0.1%, with Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Dominica?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Dominica rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 52nd and Dominica ranks 55th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Dominica: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/dominica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/dominica/">Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Dominica: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
222 places, 1,110 data points, 2018–2022
Last refreshed