Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Eritrea: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
1.2%
in 2022
Eritrea
1.3%
in 2022
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
52nd
Eritrea rank
50th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.3% against 1.2% in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Eritrea ahead.
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 52nd and Eritrea ranks 50th of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2.2% | 1.6% | 0.6% | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 1.3% against 1.2% in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Eritrea?
- 0.1%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Eritrea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Eritrea rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 52nd and Eritrea ranks 50th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.