British Virgin Islands vs Cocos (Keeling) Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing

British Virgin Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
0.0%
in 2022
British Virgin Islands rank
163rd
Cocos (Keeling) Islands rank
167th

Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands
00.20.40.6201820202022

How they compare

British Virgin Islands currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Cocos (Keeling) Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes British Virgin Islands's figure about 2.0 times Cocos (Keeling) Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.

British Virgin Islands ranks 163rd and Cocos (Keeling) Islands ranks 167th of 174 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, British Virgin Islands averaged higher in 1 and Cocos (Keeling) Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands Cocos (Keeling) Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cocos (Keeling) Islands
2020s 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% British Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, British Virgin Islands or Cocos (Keeling) Islands?
British Virgin Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Cocos (Keeling) Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between British Virgin Islands and Cocos (Keeling) Islands?
0.0%, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Cocos (Keeling) Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do British Virgin Islands and Cocos (Keeling) Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
British Virgin Islands ranks 163rd and Cocos (Keeling) Islands ranks 167th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs Cocos (Keeling) Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/british-virgin-islands/cocos-keeling-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/british-virgin-islands/cocos-keeling-islands/">British Virgin Islands vs Cocos (Keeling) Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
222 places, 1,110 data points, 2018–2022
Last refreshed