Canada vs Martinique: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Canada
1.6%
in 2022
Martinique
1.5%
in 2022
Canada rank
41st
Martinique rank
44th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Canada
- Martinique
How they compare
Canada currently reports 1.6% against 1.5% in Martinique, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 41st and Martinique ranks 44th of 188 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Martinique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.7% | 1.7% | 1.0% | Canada |
| 2020s | 3.1% | 1.2% | 1.9% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Canada or Martinique?
- Canada, at 1.6% against 1.5% in Martinique as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Canada and Martinique?
- 0.1%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Martinique?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Canada and Martinique rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Canada ranks 41st and Martinique ranks 44th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.