Caribbean vs Finland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Caribbean
0.3%
in 2022
Finland
2.2%
in 2022
Caribbean rank
31st
Finland rank
30th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Caribbean
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 2.2% against 0.3% in Caribbean, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Finland's figure about 6.2 times Caribbean's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 31st and Finland ranks 30th of 34 groups.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3% | 6.3% | 6.0% | Finland |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 1.8% | 1.4% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Caribbean or Finland?
- Finland, at 2.2% against 0.3% in Caribbean as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Caribbean and Finland?
- 1.9%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Caribbean and Finland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Caribbean ranks 31st and Finland ranks 30th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.