Caribbean vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Caribbean
0.3%
in 2022
Norway
2.2%
in 2022
Caribbean rank
31st
Norway rank
28th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Caribbean
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 2.2% against 0.3% in Caribbean, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Norway's figure about 6.3 times Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Norway ahead.
Caribbean ranks 31st and Norway ranks 28th of 34 groups.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3% | 5.2% | 4.9% | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.6% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Caribbean or Norway?
- Norway, at 2.2% against 0.3% in Caribbean as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Caribbean and Norway?
- 1.9%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Caribbean and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Caribbean ranks 31st and Norway ranks 28th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.