Central and Southern Asia vs Djibouti: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Central and Southern Asia
1.3%
in 2022
Djibouti
4.4%
in 2022
Central and Southern Asia rank
15th
Djibouti rank
8th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Central and Southern Asia
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 4.4% against 1.3% in Central and Southern Asia, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 3.5 times Central and Southern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Central and Southern Asia ahead.
Central and Southern Asia ranks 15th and Djibouti ranks 8th of 30 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central and Southern Asia averaged higher in 1 and Djibouti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.7% | 1.2% | 0.5% | Central and Southern Asia |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 5.7% | 4.1% | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Central and Southern Asia or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 4.4% against 1.3% in Central and Southern Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Central and Southern Asia and Djibouti?
- 3.1%, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia and Djibouti?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Central and Southern Asia and Djibouti rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Central and Southern Asia ranks 15th and Djibouti ranks 8th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.