Central and Southern Asia vs Greenland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Central and Southern Asia
1.3%
in 2022
Greenland
3.8%
in 2022
Central and Southern Asia rank
15th
Greenland rank
9th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Central and Southern Asia
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 3.8% against 1.3% in Central and Southern Asia, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Greenland's figure about 3.0 times Central and Southern Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Central and Southern Asia ranks 15th and Greenland ranks 9th of 30 groups.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.7% | 3.5% | 1.8% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 3.0% | 1.5% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Central and Southern Asia or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 3.8% against 1.3% in Central and Southern Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Central and Southern Asia and Greenland?
- 2.5%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia and Greenland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Central and Southern Asia and Greenland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Central and Southern Asia ranks 15th and Greenland ranks 9th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.