Central Asia vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Central Asia
0.3%
in 2022
Norway
2.2%
in 2022
Central Asia rank
30th
Norway rank
30th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Central Asia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 2.2% against 0.3% in Central Asia, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Norway's figure about 7.6 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Norway ahead.
Central Asia ranks 30th and Norway ranks 30th of 31 groups.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7% | 5.2% | 4.5% | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.2% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Central Asia or Norway?
- Norway, at 2.2% against 0.3% in Central Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Central Asia and Norway?
- 1.9%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Central Asia and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Central Asia ranks 30th and Norway ranks 30th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.