Central Asia vs Sweden: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Central Asia
0.3%
in 2022
Sweden
1.8%
in 2022
Central Asia rank
31st
Sweden rank
33rd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Central Asia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.8% against 0.3% in Central Asia, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 6.5 times Central Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 31st and Sweden ranks 33rd of 43 regions.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7% | 7.1% | 6.4% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 2.2% | 1.5% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Central Asia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1.8% against 0.3% in Central Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Central Asia and Sweden?
- 1.5%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Central Asia and Sweden rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Central Asia ranks 31st and Sweden ranks 33rd of 43 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.