Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Chile
1.1%
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau
1.2%
in 2022
Chile rank
61st
Guinea-Bissau rank
59th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Chile
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.2% against 1.1% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Chile ranks 61st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 59th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.7% | 2.5% | 0.8% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Chile or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1.2% against 1.1% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.1%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Chile ranks 61st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 59th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.