Cocos (Keeling) Islands vs Naoero: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Naoero
0.0%
in 2022
Cocos (Keeling) Islands rank
167th
Naoero rank
169th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Cocos (Keeling) Islands
- Naoero
How they compare
Cocos (Keeling) Islands currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Naoero, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Cocos (Keeling) Islands's figure about 1.1 times Naoero's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Naoero ahead.
Cocos (Keeling) Islands ranks 167th and Naoero ranks 169th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cocos (Keeling) Islands averaged higher in 1 and Naoero in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cocos (Keeling) Islands | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Cocos (Keeling) Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Cocos (Keeling) Islands or Naoero?
- Cocos (Keeling) Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Naoero as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Naoero?
- 0.0%, with Cocos (Keeling) Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Naoero?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Naoero rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Cocos (Keeling) Islands ranks 167th and Naoero ranks 169th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.